|
If
there is one major area that needs
to be improved in medical school training, it is in the field of
nutrition. Traditionally, diseases were viewed as attacking the
body from the outside, like an infectious agent. Nutrition and
diet were usually not emphasized as a critical factor of the
battle in the study of Western medicine. Now, it is known that
nutrition and the general state of health are both crucial in
fighting, preventing and recovering from disease, including
breast cancer.
The medical
information regarding the usefulness and efficacy of dietary
supplements and herbs has been studied and developed differently
from the information regarding chemotherapy regimens. Medical
researchers study groups of people closely to study the efficacy
of a particular dose or sequence of chemotherapy regimens
compared to the best treatment plan already being used. This
information is published for a specialized audience of cancer
specialists, who use the data in the treatment of their
patients. On the other hand, herbal and dietary supplements are
rarely studied in this manner. Instead, people trained in other
modes of treatment use remedies that have been passed on from
their teachers and seem to be useful in treating their patients.
Physicians have slowly come to realize the need for more
traditional scientific testing of these herbal and supplementary
therapeutic modalities.
Most women with
breast cancer diagnoses are partially convinced that they have
caused their breast cancer by poor dietary practice, lack of
exercise or excessive stress. There is no evidence, however,
that any particular agent or factor is responsible for breast
cancer. Quite popular now are publications and books suggesting
that breast cancer can be prevented and even be cured, by
dietary modification and lifestyle change. As famous as this
approach is nowadays, there is no evidence to support this
claim. This approach has a certain appeal to many individuals
basically because it is simple and empowering.
Nor is there
evidence to support supposition that breast cancer results from
depressed immune system function. Sadly, it appears that the
immune system cannot determine a breast cancer cell from a
normal breast glandular cell even with their significant
differences due to DNA damage. An example of this, the
development of the drug trastuzumab (Herceptin) is based on the
overproduction of a gene fragment that leads to increased
amounts of a cell surface protein not found on normal cells. The
host cannot differentiate this abnormal cell and its increase in
protein, but an antibody can be developed by using another
species' immune system and then, by using genetic engineering,
that information can be transferred into a human
antibody-producing cell. These genetically altered human cells
then produce an antibody to attack the cell surface protein.
This antibody can destroy the cell and make it more susceptible
to other anticancer agents. The important issue is that breast
cancer is not recognized by a normal immune system. As more
knowledge is obtained, it may be possible to manipulate the
immune system through vaccines and genetically modified
proteins, but the immune system in a breast cancer patient is
almost certainly functioning well. If a cancer patient requires
chemotherapy, this may impair the immune system temporarily, but
this is completely reversible and will not allow the cancer any
advantage.
Your immune
system is important in infection prophylaxis and you need to
take care of it and your body and its ability to heal through
nutrition, vitamins and exercise..
.
|